Subject	taxonomy?
Posted by	Marshall on November 11, 2003 at 1:38 PM
	This message has been viewed 79 times.
In Reply To	A few suggestions... posted by infamouseb (NYC) on November 11, 2003 at 01:13 PM
Message	:Create a taxonomy listing on vote to FAQ section. :Allow members to confirm the most useful posts so we don't have to read all the B.S. :Just offering some ideas.... Isn't that someone who stuffs dead animals? Oh wait, that's taxidermy. Hey- now that we know what someone who stuffs dead animals is called, you wanna know what you call someone who stuffs live animals? Genic. Can we confirm this as the most useless post? We can put that taxonomy to work.
Follow Ups	I Know it's been done a million times... - jaymz91tt 13:02:27 11/11/03 z1 sells ash's ecu - mickiemagik(OH) 13:03:35 11/11/03 go with ashspec (n/m) - Solidpantz 13:04:53 11/11/03 www.z1motorsports.com, I have an Ash one and i'm very happy - RAGTPZ(OH) 13:04:56 11/11/03 Search should be your new best friend. (n/m) - Z Wang(Austin) 13:06:13 11/11/03 Let me ask a question then, why would you post again? - SeedyROM 13:07:43 11/11/03 A few suggestions... - infamouseb (NYC) 13:13:01 11/11/03 Ideas are good. Thanks. (n/m) - SeedyROM 13:19:21 11/11/03 taxonomy? - Marshall 13:38:59 11/11/03 Taxonomy = Catergories - infamouseb (NYC) 13:42:53 11/11/03 lol, I know. - Marshall 13:45:37 11/11/03 I knew something was up =). (n/m) - Kenny 14 psi 13:48:50 11/11/03 yeah, yeah... - Marshall 13:52:03 11/11/03 Re: yeah, yeah... - genic 13:58:45 11/11/03 stuffing animals would be TAXIDERMY (n/m) - ENVYMYZ 13:56:49 11/11/03 reading comprehension owns u. (n/m) - Sportzcoop 14:32:31 11/11/03 wow (n/m) - Spee 21:35:57 11/11/03 side swiped (n/m) - genic 14:02:43 11/11/03 let's see... - JunomeanGF 14:55:30 11/11/03 eerrrrrrr....*kingdom (n/m) - JunomeanGF 15:24:25 11/11/03 put a FAQ section on the site - the_real_dummy 13:18:08 11/11/03 I guess I am more of a newby than I'd like to admit... - jaymz91tt 13:20:38 11/11/03 JWT is your friend (n/m) - Scotts94z32 13:13:13 11/11/03 2nd!!! (n/m) - JERRY 13:28:12 11/11/03 cool, maybe he can introduce us to him. (n/m) - hoss 13:48:19 11/11/03 If someone can clarify for me so others aren't having - PiotrC70 13:14:25 11/11/03 Maybe Ash can comment on this so we can halt speculation - SeedyROM 13:18:16 11/11/03 Boost depends on more parameters than the size of the jet. - Kenny 14 psi 13:50:56 11/11/03 BIG 2nd. I run 17psi everyday on 91 with no ping, 15BTDC - Scotts94z32 14:25:00 11/11/03 You are a fluke. I bet at least ONE SoCal guy will run - SeedyROM 14:30:48 11/11/03 ditto. I don't know why it is, but it is... take it and run - Scotts94z32 14:59:38 11/11/03 Exactly :) (n/m) - SeedyROM 15:33:14 11/11/03 Turn up your hearing aid.. (n/m) - ibpimpn 14:50:26 11/11/03 I meant there are more factors, like Kenny said. - Scotts94z32 15:02:09 11/11/03 i hit 14 solid like I mentioned w/ my current mods. (n/m) - PiotrC70 15:31:29 11/11/03 Not sure. I am using a stock guage which is reading close - ibpimpn 16:51:13 11/11/03 you NEED an aftermarket gauge... like NOW. a diff of 2psi - Scotts94z32 18:50:19 11/11/03 I put less than 1k a year on my tt and run the .045's - ibpimpn 20:55:10 11/11/03 why do you have it then? (n/m) - Spee 21:41:52 11/11/03 Because I can.. (n/m) - ibpimpn 22:35:38 11/11/03 True, I got a couple of extra psi of boost when Greg install - PLEAZURE in CA (SD) 16:03:10 11/11/03 I have the ASH and .035 and I am lucky to hit 12-13 solid. - unluky 14:58:59 11/11/03 Most likely boost leaks there.. (n/m) - AshsZ 16:24:43 11/11/03 11 psi on .052's on my '96. (n/m) - ZXtaZTT 15:48:00 11/11/03 Nah dude, its just your car. You likely have a hose - AshsZ 16:09:33 11/11/03 i like my ash-spec ecu - the_real_dummy 13:14:40 11/11/03 Wasn't bashing JWT......thanks anyways (n/m) - jaymz91tt 18:50:31 11/11/03 i wasn't saying you were bashing JWT - the_real_dummy 23:15:25 11/11/03 Re: I Know it's been done a million times... - bawoelz 13:46:18 11/11/03 ugh...I hate stupid people. (n/m) - Spee 21:31:07 11/11/03 While we're on the subject... - incognito Z 22:54:28 11/11/03 Re: While we're on the subject... - StormShadow 23:44:56 11/11/03
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.